The recent ‘revelation’ that the first Briton was ‘black’ seems to me to be a wholly fallacious attempt at justifying what has been done to Britain via mass non-white immigration over the last 70 years. Without going into the so-called ‘science’ that has been presented as fact, let’s just consider for a moment some of the more logical reasons why this portrayal of ‘ancient Brits’ as being ‘black’ is more likely to be ideologically motivated than rooted in actual science.
The growing public awareness of and disdain for what has been done to Britain by successive governments and the now undeniable fact that Britain now faces a minority white future as a result of their policies, is a more likely explanation for this politicised unveiling. How else could they maintain the myth of Britain as a ‘nation of immigrants’ other than presenting this one DNA sample as evidence of an historically ‘black Britain?’
Those who claim Britain is a ‘nation of immigrants’ seem to have an extremely vague understanding of what the word immigrant actually means the definition being ‘a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country.’ This isn’t the same thing as population movements before the formation of nation states. Immigration is something that a nation can allow or not allow, an immigrant is somebody a nation allows to live within its borders. If we go back 10,000 years or more, those populations on the move weren’t immigrants in the modern sense of the term, they were settlers and pioneers. Geographical separation as a result of the mass migrations of the past is what led to the evolving of the different races of today. Thousands of years of this separation and the adaptations to different environmental pressures and survival requirements are what led to the differences between the races that we see today.
That a 76% ‘probability’ of Cheddar Man having ‘dark to black skin’ is presented as conclusive proof, shows an unprecedented desperation to reinvent the racial history of Britain to conform to a failed multiracialist experiment imposed upon the British people by a hostile elite. It appears to be an extremely weak attempt to undo the thousands of years of white racial heritage in these Isles and a devious attempt to excuse the intentional racial replacement that is taking place under the banner of diversity.
Nowhere in a genuine scientific analysis of such magnitude that rewrites an entire people’s history would one case study be portrayed as representative of an entire population of that period. If a skeleton thousands of years old were discovered in Africa and a DNA test showed that it had a 76% chance of having white skin, I seriously doubt that the very same establishment now claiming the first Britons to be black, would claim that the first African was white alluding to the idea that Africa had a white rather than black history on the basis of one skeleton.
Predictably, the anti-white left are lapping it up like the gullible useful idiots that they are clinging onto anything that they can use to throw against their political opponents and to manipulate the public mind into believing that mass immigration and the transformation of Britain is not such a big issue after all if the first Briton was ‘black.’
The Cultural Marxist left require something like this to ensure that their long-term strategy of supplanting the European people and Western Civilisation remains on track. They know that the Overton window has swung wide open and that the European people are slowly but surely regaining their collective racial consiousness. Something like the Cheddar Man DNA test seems rather strange in light of the decades of open door immigration and the increasingly desperate need to pass it off as being unimportant. It’s almost as if it has been done purposefully with the intent of undoing this growing racial awareness and to try and deconstruct the irrefutable arguments of those who oppose the destruction of the European people through mass non-European immigration.
Let’s just assume that the Cheddar Man DNA test did in fact show that he did have a darker skin complexion than what we would associate with indigenous Brits today, it doesn’t really mean anything in the grand scheme of things. As alluded to earlier, one sample is nowhere near enough to make such outlandish assumptions that the entire population in Britain at that time were all black. What if this ‘discovery’ was just one person, a slave, somebody brought to Britain by other groups? How does one DNA sample all of a sudden become a rewriting of the entire racial history of an ancient people and country if not for ideological reasons?
In no other scientific field would such a claim based on a ‘76% probability’ be allowed to be made let alone be pushed by an entire media and academic establishment as being 100% factual. If indeed the population of Britain 10,000 years ago were of a darker skin tone, then again, what would it matter, it’s what we are today and what we have been for millennia that is important. It wasn’t people looking like a ‘dark skinned Cheddar Man’ that built the Britain we all know, he wasn’t building great civilisations, writing great books, composing great music, and bringing ingenuity and invention to the rest of the world. The likelihood is however, that the depiction of Cheddar Man as being black is simply an ideolgically motivated scam given a veneer of scientific validity. It isn’t beyond the realms of possibility that science has been coopted and perverted to conform to ideological requirements. It is entirely possible that those behind this are politically and ideologically predisposed to produce these results to conform to their own worldview.
An early description of Britons is to be found in the Tacitus: Agricola Book 1 written in the first century AD:
11. Who were the original inhabitants of Britain, whether they were indigenous or foreign, is, as usual among barbarians, little known. Their physical characteristics are various, and from these conclusions may be drawn. The red hair and large limbs of the inhabitants of Caledonia point clearly to a German origin. The dark complexion of the Silures, their usually curly hair, and the fact that Spain is the opposite shore to them, are an evidence that Iberians of a former date crossed over and occupied these parts. Those who are nearest to the Gauls are also like them, either from the permanent influence of original descent, or, because in countries which run out so far to meet each other, climate has produced similar physical qualities.
Are we expected to believe that ancient Britain from the time of Cheddar Man went from what we are being told was a ‘black Britain’ to a Britain that was exclusively European in appearance with no remnants of this supposed black beginning?
There is an unparalleled attack being carried out on the validity of white identity coming at a time when white populations in historically white nations are being demographically engineered into a racial minority. Doesn’t it seem just a little timely that at the same time as this transformation is taking place, that a so-called ‘scientific’ discovery has found the first ancient Briton to be something other than white?
Those holding this ‘discovery’ up as an excuse for supporting mass immigration because ‘we are all immigrants’ are pushing an anti-white ideolgical narrative that is geared towards deconstructing white identity. No other people are subject to this level of assault upon their collective identity.
In Britain it is not uncommon for our history and the history of other European people to be portrayed as something it never was as the above collection of images show. Historically white people being portrayed as being non-white. Is it possible that the ‘black’ Cheddar Man is just another, more elaborate deception using science as its cloak of respectability?
If you support what we do then please consider making a donation or purchasing a pin badge or some stickers which not only helps us keep this site going, but allows to spend more time writing and researching. All of your support is greatly appreciated.