If you were intent on bringing down a powerful rival whose philosophy, as originally founded, was strong, independent and entirely opposite from your owna country that you would not want to confront militarily how would you go about it? The answer is simple; orchestrate the society’s destruction from within.
Although possibly taking longer than a military victory and requiring great patience, the damage would be just effective if not more so. When you destroy from within, you do it by using that country’s own people, no blood is spilled in combat and the physical infrastructure is left intact.
In any country, there are but a few key areas that determine how the citizens mature, live and develop their beliefs. These are the focal points that must be attacked. In his book, On War, Clausewitz referred to this concept of identifying and then focusing on select points as attacking the centre of gravity.
The centre of gravity is that key element, if controlled or destroyed, would most hurt your opponent and is the critical factor in achieving your objective. In this case, when taking control of or destroying a country from within, the key is to attack and control the mind of the inhabitants you must shape the way people view life and the values upon which their life is based. Shape the mind and you control their direction. Control their direction and you can lead them down a pathway to hell.
The centres of gravity I would shape in orchestrating a country’s downfall from within are its perception of truth, its future generations, the political philosophy, its sense of nationalism and of course, the economy.
To shape truth, control the media:
Most people absorb what they know about life from the major media centres these days. The media paints the picture for all to see. If that picture is constantly distorted, lies become accepted ad truth, i.e. tell enough lies repeatedly and soon those lies are accepted as fact. Spin and concoct, distort and influence using the public platforms such as television, radio and print and you can influence, sway and control the mind of the vast majority of its population in any area you choose. This subversive influence includes pitting one group against another in order to foment internal discord as well as ridiculing, discrediting and challenging moral principals and national values in order to destroy any hint of a strong spiritual foundation or allegiance to a unique national culture. This is a much easier task if many in your target audience have become lazy, ill-educated, ill-informed, unthinking and apathetic.
To shape future generations, control the schools:
Incrementally indoctrinate the children with principles that are sympathetic to your philosophy. Make future generations weak in mind, body and spirit. Avoid teaching children the basic facts about their own history, constitution or rights. Teach them that natural aggression is wrong and docile submission is right. Teach them that any basis of a moral foundation, like the principles of religion, is a weakness to be avoided in the name of freedom and also redefine the concept of patriotism to support your views. Teach them to cast off old values and traditions in the interest and name of sensitivity after all, we wouldn’t want to offend anyone with our old fashioned or traditional beliefs now would we? And guns, guns are wicked, dangerous, and socially unacceptable an evil that must be eradicated from society for the good of the children of course.
To shape the political philosophy, infiltrate the government:
Whenever and wherever possible place those sympathetic to your philosophy into office at all levels the higher, the better so they can sway the direction of the country within every function of government, promising solutions, handouts and benefits for all. In such a way you can tilt legislation toward incrementally increasing the control of and dependency on government a government that you are shaping. Concurrently, if you can pack the courts with appointed judges who will not hold you accountable to the law and its constitution, you can act with virtual impunity. Infiltration at the highest levels can also be employed to weaken the military through budget cuts, unwarranted restrictions and over commitment, degrading both force morale and effectiveness. A country without a strong military is like a bull without horns or a tiger without claws defenceless and vulnerable.
To shape the sense of nationalism, dilute the culture and the language:
A strong society has as its foundation a unique culture and a common language. Simply put, it is the culture and language which ultimately defines and unites a nation. If you can manipulate these two critical elements through legislative action and social pressure, you can weaken the foundation of any country. How? Introduce and eventually force the acceptance of a multi-cultural concept and refuse to accept a common tongue as the official language. In short, prevent cultural assimilation and undermine any sense of nationalism. Encourage and orchestrate a mosaic society rather than a ‘melting pot’ and you will eventually mortally wound the national fabric.This is a good summary of how a nation can be subverted and destroyed from within. It describes concisely the methods that are implemented to undermine a nation and its culture. One criticism I have, is that I don’t subscribe to the idea of assimilation. In the Western world we live in now, any notion of assimilation is just further facilitating the ongoing racial and cultural destruction of Western nations.
Whether it be forced multiculturalism or forced assimilation it is all severely damaging to our own unique racial and cultural identity and their long-term survival in a world in which we are the true minority.
We have had no say in whether we wanted multiculturalism forced upon us, or whether we wanted to assimilate other cultures and people into our nations. We are told that this is how it is to be, we have been forced to ‘accept’ what has been done by the power of the judiciary and the lawmakers. We were never going to get the choice, because the Western world would have resoundly rejected it and so it had to be imposed.
The outcome of forced multiculturalism is always conflict, the outcome of assimilation is always the weakening and disappearance of the host culture and people.
Help us to keep this site running by making a small donation which will also enable us to dedicate more time researching.