On the 14th July there will be a huge protest in London held by supporters of Tommy Robinson. An estimated 15,000 turned out earlier this month for a demonstration against his arrest and imprisonment. Regardless of the ideological differences many have with Robinson, including ourselves, the point we want to make here is about the response of the left to the protest earlier this month and to the upcoming event in July.
The left are in meltdown at the size of the crowd that turned out in London on the 9th June claiming that it is the biggest ‘far right mobilisation since the EDL.’ They are now calling for a counter-protest on the 14th July to ‘drive back the Nazis.’
Politicians such as the anti-white Diane Abbot and trade union leaders have signed an open letter calling for a mass mobilisation ‘to drive these new developments on the far-right back.’
Essentially what they are calling for is violence on the streets. Rather than allowing people to assemble and protest as is their right, they want to encourage the violent elements of the left to converge on London to engage in confrontation which is the inevitable outcome whenever the opposing groups come together and with the antagonistic strategy employed by the left. They want to oppose the right to assembly and to free speech by encouraging mass repressive tolerance through violence and major disruption. They claim that any protests ‘must be peaceful,’ however they know full well that most protests in which the left are involved tend to erupt in violence.
If it was a leftist protest that was being countered by a mass mobilisation of anti-leftist activists then the media and the left would be up in arms wailing about how ‘nazis plan to attack peaceful protest.’ What you won’t see in the media however is an accurate reporting of what people like Diane Abbott are calling for which is for Communist and Anarchist groups to oppose the ‘Free Tommy’ protest. These are the sorts of groups that attach themselves to these leftist events and just as in Charlottesville the left will be totally blameless in the eyes of the biased media when violence ensues.
The open letter states that:
‘Wherever the far right’s support grows so does racism and violence. Let’s come together to defend our multicultural society from those who spread hatred and division.’
They must be completely oblivious to the fact, or are intentionally misleading the public to believe that ‘our multicultural society’ is not already beset by problems. We do not live in a peaceful and harmonious multicultural utopia. It is anything but, and these people are creating problems that our children will have to face in the coming decades.
The day before the planned protest for Tommy Robinson, on the 13th July, President Trump is due to visit the UK and again politicians and leftist leaders are calling for a protest against Trump that they know will likely descend into violence yet will they be held accountable when violence occurs? Will Diane Abbott and Sadiq Khan be held responsible when the left riot? No, of course not. As is usually the case the lying press will claim that ‘racists’ were the cause of any disorder and that the violent leftist instigators were merely there as morally upstanding members of the ‘multicultural community defending our multicultural society.’ A ‘multicultural society’ that they have built and which they use as a battering ram against our identity.
It is an age old tactic of the left to initiate violence under the banner of righteous indignation and to then blame their opponents for it and the media works in tandem with them in this regard. They do it for two reasons, to silence the message that is being delivered so that the public doesn’t get to hear it, and to associate the message with violence and disorder in the hope that the public falls for the notion that a nationalistic message is a violent message. The public don’t see that the left repeatedly use physical intimidation to silence free speech and routinely cause trouble then present themselves as the victims.
The left believes themselves to be the arbiters of who has the right to freedom of assembly and the right to freedom of speech. You will never see the left for example turn out in their numbers to oppose an Islamist march calling for the downfall of the West and the imposition of Sharia law. You will never see the left turn out to oppose the racially motivated targeting of white girls by Islamic grooming gangs for mass rape. You will never see the left turn out to oppose the murder of a white victim at the hands of non-whites.
However you will see the left turn out wherever and whenever there is a protest, meeting or speech being given by anybody who dares to oppose mass immigration, Islamisation, Islamic grooming or the visit of a politician or President of another country that dares to go against the leftist worldview. It is then that you see the true nature of the left. As far as they are concerned Trump should be banned because he doesn’t agree with them, he should be protested against and if possible mass disruption caused so that his visit is remembered more for the violent opposition than for anything he may have to say.
Ironically, it is the left who claim to represent the working class that are the most dangerous enemy of the working class and especially the white working class. Whenever the white working class organise as a group in our own interests then the left are there to attack them physically and verbally. Every other group is allowed to organise on the basis of their identity yet the white working class are not. The white working class, as far as the left are concerned, must accept their impending minority status and the erosion of their identity and culture. If they meekly do this the left will leave them alone, if they don’t and go against the anti-white dogma of the left then they will see that the left do not represent them whatsoever and in actual fact seek their downfall as a group.
The left believe that they have the right to determine who is allowed to speak and anybody that they don’t want to be heard will be met with violent opposition.
I’ll finish with some quotes from Herbert Marcuse from his essay on Repressive Tolerance:
‘The tolerance which is the token of a free society can, under the prevailing conditions of tyranny by the majority, only be won in the sustained effort of radical minorities. Minorities intolerant, militantly intolerant and disobedient to the rules of behavior which tolerate destruction and suppression.’
‘Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance: … it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word.’
If you support what we do, would like to see more articles and want to help us maintain this website then please consider making a donation by clicking on the donate banner below. All donations over £10 will receive free stickers or a badge. We have incurred extra costs for security for the site so your support is very much appreciated.